{"id":1038,"date":"2020-11-03T22:02:46","date_gmt":"2020-11-03T22:02:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/camilocisera.com\/?p=1038"},"modified":"2020-11-06T22:08:14","modified_gmt":"2020-11-06T22:08:14","slug":"investing-blindly","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/camilocisera.com\/en\/investing-blindly\/","title":{"rendered":"INVESTING BLINDLY"},"content":{"rendered":"
When it comes to obtaining returns, being in the right place at the right time is as important as having the required skills: chance and capability.<\/span><\/p> Let\u2019s imagine a well-prepared investor who is able to choose the three Argentine stocks that will perform best in the future. These stocks are <\/span>Grupo Financiero Valores<\/span><\/i>, <\/span>Aluar<\/span><\/i> and <\/span>Transportadora de Gas del Sur<\/span><\/i>. The problem is that the investor is in January 2018, during the prelude to Argentina\u2019s worst crisis since 2001.<\/span><\/p> The result of investing in these three stocks is a loss of 71.8% throughout two and a half years, which is enough to dampen any investor\u2019s spirits.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t Likewise, a not-so-proficient investor who lags behind the MERVAL Index on a 5% yearly basis, but who begins to invest in June 2002, will get disproportionately high results in the following five years.<\/span><\/p> Stocks move following herd behavior. It is useful to study them in detail so as to avoid falling behind the market and even to exceed its performance. However, the results are largely explained by the overall market trend, not by the selected stocks.<\/span><\/p> This maxim applies especially for Argentina due to the concentration of the listed companies in the energy and financial sectors, which reduces the possibilities of diversification.<\/span><\/p> In finance, this idea is summarized by \u201cdon\u2019t pray for alpha, pray for beta\u201d, which means \u201cdon\u2019t pray for beating the market, pray that the market won\u2019t stop climbing\u201d.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t History does not transpire homogeneously, it is plagued with fortuitous circumstances that change the course of events. The scientist John Kelly became known in 1956 for creating a formula to establish the optimal bet amount in games with positive expected outcome. Once the validity of his formula was mathematically proven it became widely used in the financial markets.<\/p> Imagine a game where you flip a coin. Heads: you double the bet; Tails: you lose half of it. You can flip the coin as many times as you want.<\/p> Betting all the capital on each coin toss could lead to an impossible-to-overcome situation after a losing streak. Conversely, a small bet means losing potential profit in a game that clearly has a positive expected value, since you either double the investment or you lose just half of it. Somewhere in the middle is the optimal amount to bet.<\/p> According to Kelly\u2019s formula, in this scenario we should bet 50% of our capital on each flip. This way you maximize the expected profit after an adequate amount of coin tosses \u2013 remember this has mathematical proof.<\/p> Kelly = (probability of winning\/potential loss) \u2013 (probability of losing\/potential profit)<\/strong><\/p> Argentina\u2019s Merval Index can be considered today as one of these flipping coins. It\u2019s impossible to know what will happen to the economy and the stock market, since even the best future scenario analysis are vulnerable to any sudden government regulation that changes the game rules, or simply to a casual or unexpected event that shapes its destiny.<\/p> According to the bullish and bearish cycles, we can infer that if the MERVAL Index returns to its long-term average, you can earn a 126% return. On the other hand, if the market keeps falling and goes beyond the low of March, we might have to close the position at a stop loss of \u201150%.<\/p><\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t Supposing the probabilities of both scenarios are 50%, Kelly suggests we should invest 60% of the bankroll.<\/span><\/p> If we stress-test this, we could consider only a 40% probability of a positive outcome and 60% odds of a negative outcome. The expected value is still positive since (40% * 126%) – (60% * 50%) = 20%. However, in this scenario Kelly\u2019s criterion reduces the optimal bet size to 32% of the bankroll, almost half than before.<\/span><\/p> That being said, most investors will not tolerate the volatility and the drops that come when investing 32% of the capital on argentine stocks, which is why referring to \u2018a half\u2019 or \u2018a quarter of\u2019 a Kelly is a common practice in the market. This also has to do with the fact that positively correlated assets also reduce the optimal kelly.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t If we find current MERVAL values enticing enough to try our luck, and we use the Kelly criterion to establish how much to invest, we should buy Argentine stocks for 32% of the capital we have set aside for risky bets. We could also take a fraction of that amount to reduce the volatility and potential losses of the portfolio.<\/p> If we live long enough to see the MERVAL climb and fall in\u00a0several additional cycles<\/a>, then this will be the proportion that should produce the best outcome.<\/p><\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
Probabilities and the Kelly criterion<\/h2>\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
Summing up<\/h2>\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t